His affectations are a dizzying sentiment, played out with the essence of a rapid dictational device – I feel I perhaps should dust of my mathematic textbooks and revise matrices; as judging by his recent consumption (of space, edible vices, technology, entertainment & reportage of sport), I’m sure there is something harshly formulaic in his ‘self’ – his ‘person’ as he apparently ‘chooses’ to define. Perhaps each of us is enslaved to some conscript of culture, perhaps we are all circling a vast ornamental dictum or philosophy, proved to each of us and allowed into some aspect of our physical body.
I guess I should restate my assumptions ()(if there are indeed any) or restate the physical limitations about our understanding of grounded space, cognition, science itself: but the predictions are simple enough. He shall return to ‘his’ abode (the place of his residing, empower his presence (in terms of material consumption) by flicking and allowing a dictation of desire via advertisements, (projected across part of the shared living space) and preach like he actually has some understanding about the foundations of the surrounding culture – OK, he is VERY aware of the rules but this is about its very archietextual design, shelved behind tinted glass (with projected visuals confusing his understanding of information)
No comments:
Post a Comment